archive.stlimc.org : http://archive.stlimc.org
archive.stlimc.org

murder yes

ENMOD Radiation Science and Earthquakes


GLOBAL WARMING IS JUST ONE PART OF A FARCE WHOSE TRUE PURPOSE IS TO SECRETLY DEPLOY ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION SCIENCE TO MELT THE ICE CAPS (oil and mineral wealth galore!) AND TO TERRORIZE ANY COUNTRY WHO WILL NOT GET IN LINE WITH THE CULT OF DEATH WHICH THE NWO IS.....



Bearden Described The Working of TMTs (Tesla Magnifying Transmitters):

They will go through anything. What you do is set up a standing wave through the Earth and the molten core of the Earth begins to feed that wave (We are talking Tesla now). When you have that standing wave, you have set up a triode. What you've done is that the molten core of the earth is feeding the energy and its like your signal--that you are putting in--is gating the gate of a triode....then what you do is that you change the frequency. If you change the frequency one way (dephase it) you dump the energy up in the atmosphere beyond the point on the other side of the earth that you focused upon. You start ionising the air, you can change the weather flow patterns (Jet streams etc)--you can change all that--if you dump it gradually---real gradually--you influence the heck out of the weather...its a great weather machine. If you dump it sharply, you don't get a little ionization like that...you will get fireballs and flashes (Plasma & Earthquakes) that will come down on the surface of the earth...you can cause enormous weather changes over entire regions by playing that thing back and forth....


---------------
THIS WAS DEFEATED BY BUSH SO HE AND HIS CHRISTIAN CULT OF DEATH COULD DEPLOY RADIATION TECHNOLOGY ON THE USA TO CONQUER IT FOR THE BANKS OF LONDON (ROTHSCHILD-ISRAEL([search])) WHOM THEY ARE LOYAL TO...CHRISTIANITY IS ANTI-AMERICAN.

from The Space Preservation ACt of 2001
NOTICE THE REFERENCE TO TECTONIC WEAPONS

To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.

This Act may be cited as the `Space Preservation Act of 2001'.

SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE.

Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.'.

SEC. 3. PERMANENT BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE.

The President shall--

(1) implement a permanent ban on space-based weapons of the United States and remove from space any existing space-based weapons of the United States; and

(2) immediately order the permanent termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States and their components.

SEC. 4. WORLD AGREEMENT BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS.

The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing a world agreement banning space-based weapons.

SEC. 5. REPORT.

The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, a report on--

(1) the implementation of the permanent ban on space-based weapons required by section 3; and

(2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the agreement described in section 4.

SEC. 6. NON SPACE-BASED WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.

Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for--

(1) space exploration;

(2) space research and development;

(3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or

(4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems.

SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) The term `space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.

(2)(A) The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following:

(i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--

(I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object;

(II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object;

(III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or

(IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means.

(ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)--

(I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);

(II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or

(III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.

(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--

(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;

(ii) chemtrails;

(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;

(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;

(v) laser weapons systems;

(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and

(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.

(C) The term `exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.

--------------------------------------------



YOUR LIFE AS A HUMAN TEST SUBJECT
By Bill Gallagher 051404
www.luxefaire.com/electro.html

Chemtrails And Terror
In The Age Of Nuclear War
By Amy Worthington
Idaho Observer
6-3-4
proliberty.com/observer/20040501.htm

PATENTLY OBVIOUS AEROSOL PROGRAMS
PATENT LIST
users.ev1.net/~seektress/patlist.htm

SOVIET SCALAR ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS
The Coin used by Russia to buy a BIG piece of the New World Order
At American Expense
www.luxefaire.com/SCALARRUSSIA.HTML

BEYOND TREASON
GULF WAR VETS GET THE TRUTH IN SPITE OF THEIR MEDICAL RECORDS BEING DESTROYED AT OKC FEDERAL BUIDLING BY ISRAELI FALSE FLAG TERRORISM.
powerhour.com

ATMOSPHERIC CHARGED-ION PLASMAS
www.luxefaire.com/chargedionplasmas/index.html
--------------------------------------------

ENRON AND WEATHER CONTROL

For the most part these are old articles...i got the lead from an article i pulled off clifford carnicoms site, its after these links, somebody posted it without a link a while ago, 01/03, it bears reading all the way. It obviously is from the time before the big E went kaput. I wonder if it had anything to do with the big E going kaput....if the CT technology was co-opted for surveillance, and other nefarious uses like mass mind alteration, because of, let us say, something like TERROR, then it is not beyond the realm of possibility that enron got shut down to hide all this....there were many small-fry weather control companys like Dyn-O-Mat ffeding off this lopsided insurance, guaranteeing enron or whoever certain weather factors for a price...even being small fry the ops were big bux and a lot of the early stuff went down in Clintons time....I think the initial spraying experiments by these weather companys was a success, meaning nobody squawked, and then way was made to deploy the control technology which govt has been developing now for 5 decades or more....b


www.derivativesstrategy.com/magazine/archive/1998/0598fea1.asp

www.themanagementor.com/kuniverse/kmailers_universe/finance_kmailers/IF_Weather.htm

www.financewise.com/public/edit/energy/weather99/wthr99-newangles.htm

www.financewise.com/public/edit/energy/weatherrisk/wthr-derivatives.htm

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm

The hype over weather derivatives is being replaced by real deals, and everybody’s scrambling for position.

The viewership of the Weather Channel has always skewed decidedly toward the nerdy. But if the lightning-fast development of the weather derivatives market is any indication, before long the ratings-challenged cable channel could reach a whole new audience financial players around the world who have suddenly become obsessed with occluded fronts, La Niña and other weather arcana that for years had been the exclusive province of people with backyard barometers.

While derivatives historians may quibble over the precise date of the first weather contract some say July 1997, while others say August of that year everyone in the weather business agrees that the market hit the ground running.

There has been an explosion of deals in the marketplace and a tremendous amount of interest on the client side, says Richard Turrin of Paribas’ strategic derivatives group. The industry has seen the birth of a new market in the last year to 18 months, and in the last six months the growth has been exponential.

Houston-based energy giant Enron estimates that between 900 and 1,000 transactions have taken place to date, with the notional value of those deals exceeding $1.5 billion. Kansas City, Mo.-based Aquila, the unregulated marketing and trading arm of Utilicorp, puts that figure closer to 1,200.

While energy firms are still the most active in the weather business, other industries are getting into the game as well. Enron has already acted as counterparty in deals with manufacturers of snowmobiles and snowblowers, the film industry and the fertilizer industry, and has fielded inquiries from theme parks, golf courses, sports-drink makers, car washes and ski resorts. Aquila boasts transactions with salt producers, ski resorts and other entertainment companies. In addition to the relatively commonplace degree-day deals, says Enron’s Lynda Clemmons, a director at the firm, she has been approached by companies interested in rainfall, snowfall and even barometric pressure contracts.

******* Weather derivatives allow companies to control the effects of the weather on demand for their products. Here are some of the most popular structures.*******

Temperature Contracts
A degree day is the deviation of a day’s average temperature from 65 degrees Fahrenheit. In the summertime, the demand for energy increases with every degree above 65; in the winter, the demand for heat increases for every degree day below 65. There are a number of degree-day products available to energy producers. In most, payment is made for every degree day above or below the strike, with a maximum payout that can range from $500,000 to $5 million or more...
-------------------------------------
Bernard Eastlund, Inventor of HAARP (High Frequency Active AURORAL Research program), from his Patent # 4,686,605 “...This invention relates to a method and apparatus for altering at least one selected region normally existing above the Earth’s surface...by initially transmitting electromagnetic radiation from the Earth’s surface... altering solar absorption...weather modification is possible... for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device...A moving plume could also serve as a means for focusing a vast amount of sunlight on selected portions of the Earth...HIGH INTENSITY, WELL CONTROLLED ELECTRICAL FIELDS CAN BE PROVIDED IN SELECTED LOCATIONS FOR VARIOUS PURPOSES...(caps ours, ed.)...Still further, plumes in accordance with the present invention can be formed to simulate and/or perform the same functions as performed by detonation of a “Heave? type nuclear device without actually having to detonate such a device...?


More Excerpts from Patent #4,686,605 HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program)
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION...
...Sufficient energy is employed to cause ionization of neutral particles (molecules of oxygen, nitrogen, and the like, PARTICULATES, etc.) which then become part of the (plasma) region, thereby increasing the charged particle density of the region. This effect can also be enhanced by providing artificial particles, eg electrons, ions, etc, directly into the region to be affected from a rocket, satellite, or the like, to supplement the particles in the naturally occurring plasma. The artificial particles are also ionized by the transmitted electromagnetic radiation thereby increasing charged particle density of the resulting plasma of the region...
In another embodiment of the invention, electron cyclotron resonance heating is carried out in the selected region or regions at sufficient power levels to allow a plasma present to generate a MIRROR FORCE which forces the charged electrons of the altered plasma UPWARD along the force line to an altitude which is higher than the original altitude... Sufficient power, eg 10 to the 15th joules, can be applied so that altered plasma can be trapped on the field line between mirror points and will oscillate in space for prolonged periods of time. By this embodiment, a plume of altered plasma can be established at selected locations for communications modifications or other purposes...
-----------------------------
ed.-That means Surveillance KEYHOLES of ALLLLLL types, folks. Coupled with Time Domain Corporation Classified Eavesdropping Patents (200+) that does not bode well for Human Liberty ANYWHERE.
--------------------------
...Thus, this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earths Atmosphere at strategic locations, and maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise than heretofore accomplished by prior art, particularly by the detonation of nuclear devices of various yields at various altitudes...
Disruption of communications can be employed by one knowledgeable of this invention as a communications network at the same time (Disruption is caused to other parties)...knowledge of the various em waves being employed and how they will vary in frequency and magnitude can be used to an advantage for positive communication, and eavesdropping purposes at the same time..

----------------------------------------------------------

1978
FROM:
stinet.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/fulcrum_main.pl
(This is hit 16 of 25.)  
AD Number: ADA072167
Subject Categories: RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
Corporate Author: MISSION RESEARCH CORP SANTA BARBARA CALIF
Title: Radio Communication Utilizing the Base of a Striated Barium Plasma.
Descriptive Note: Topical rept. Apr-Jul 78,
Personal Authors: Fulks,G. J. ;Scott,L. D. ;Sowle,D. H. ;Wortman,W. R. ;
Report Date: JUL 1978
Pages: 43 PAGES
Report Number: MRC-R-401-R
Contract Number: DNA001-78-C-0237
Project Number: S99QAXH TASKNUMBER: B053
Monitor Acronym: DNA,SBI
Monitor Series: 4670T,AD-E300 465
Descriptors: *RADIO TRANSMISSION, *STRIATIONS, NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS, HIGH FREQUENCY, PLASMAS(PHYSICS), REFLECTION, NUCLEAR EXPLOSION SIMULATION, CROSS SECTIONS, HIGH ALTITUDE, NUCLEAR CLOUDS, COMMUNICATION AND RADIO SYSTEMS, RADIO SIGNALS, BARIUM, BOTTOM, RADIO RECEPTION.
Identifiers: Avefria operations, Barium clouds, Cloud bases, Base reflection, PE62704H, WU09
Abstract: In conjunction with the DNA barium releases, Avefria I and II, an experiment was undertaken to determine if radio communication was possible off the base of a striated plasma created by these barium releases. A transmitting station was set up to broadcast a steady signal at two HF frequencies toward the base of the barium striations and two receiving stations listened for signal returns on the two frequencies. (The chosen geometry prevented reflections off the sides of the barium cloud from affecting the experiment). One station heard substantial returns while the other heard nothing. Data from the first station provide an estimate of the reflection cross sections for the base of the striated barium cloud. The negative result from the second station arises partly from limited sensitivity of equipment but the upper limit on cross section was less than that seen from the first station. This suggests a directional character for the signal reflected from the base of the cloud.
Limitation Code: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Source Code: 406548
--------------------------------------


EVERYTHING YOU EVER WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT THE SKULL AND BONES SOCIETY BUT WERE AFRAID TO ASK
KERRY AND BUSH BOTH BELONG -- THEIR DADDIES SOLD AMERICA OUT A LONG TIME AGO
www.luxefaire.com/politics.htm

HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION RESOURCE
www.dc.peachnet.edu/~shale/humanities/composition/assignments/experiment.html

MK-ULTRA LIVES! mindcontrolforums.com/mkdoctable.htm
www.raven1.net/uncom.htm

------------------------------------------------
People are not talking about several important aspects of these frenzied and frequent military developments. First is that U.S. military deployments to 132 bases outside American borders — dominated by hundreds of thousands of military personnel in Iraq, and tens of thousands in Afghanistan and in the fleets patrolling the Pacific — depletes defensive forces in America too dangerously low levels, and as we know from 9/11, America’s military defense of its own borders can realistically be expected to fail at any time. So sending so many forces out of the country all at once, especially considering Bush’s irrational and suspicious behavior, is a very ominous development, one which should terrify all Americans. J Kaminski
-----------------------------------------



I, -----------, (ON THIS DAY OF-DATE) DO HEREBY RIGHTFULLY STATE, TO ALL PARTIES CONCERNED, AND FOR ALL PURPOSES PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, THAT I SPEND THE CURRENCY OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKING CONGLOMERATE STRICTLY FROM WITHIN A SITUATION OF DURESS: THIS SITUATION BEING A REAL AND TRUE RESULT WHEREBY NO ALTERNATIVE, OR RECOURSE IS AVAILABLE TO FEDERAL RESERVE CURRENCY (WHICH IS NOT AT THIS TIME BEING ISSUED ACCORDING TO THE STRICTURES CONCERNING THE CREATION OF MONEY AS ADDRESSED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) AND I IMPLY NO CONSENT WHATSOEVER TO ANY CONTRACTS MADE IN MY NAME, OR NOT, OR IN MY INTERESTS, OR NOT, THAT I HAVE NOT DULY REVIEWED AND APPROVED WITH MY SIGNATURE. I RESERVE ALL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS LEGALLY BEQUEATHED TO ME AS A NATURAL AND SOVEREIGN CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF ANY TYPE. IN NO WAY SHALL MY SIGNATURE OR MARK, OR ANY ACTION OF MINE NOT STRICTLY DEFINED AS CONSENT, BE CONSTRUED AS CONSENT TO ANY OTHER CONTRACT, AGREEMENT, OR PROCESS OF WHICH I HAVE NOT BEEN MADE COGNIZANT, AND GIVEN MY FORMAL APPROVAL. I HEREBY RECORD AND MAKE KNOWN MY KNOWLEDGE, AND I HEREBY DEMAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND SATISFACTION BASED ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VERSUS ANY SUBSIDIARY LAW BASED ON THE DEFINED BENEFIT OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKING CONGLOMERATES CURRENCY, ANY STATE OF EMERGENCY, OR ANY OTHER SCENARIO WHEREBY MY RIGHTS AS A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES ARE AT ISSUE. THIS NOTICE SUPERCEDES ALL OTHER STATUS ASSIGNED TO ME, WITH OR WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE, BY ANY ENTITY OF ANY TYPE.
------------------------------------------
PHOTOGRAPH THE SKY

GATHER EVIDENCE OF ATMOSPHERIC ENGINEERING AND ATMOSPHERIC WEAPONRY BEING USED AGAINST THE PLANET AND THE PEOPLE.

JERRY E. SMITH AUTHOR OF HAARP: ULTIMATE WEAPON OF THE (NWO) CONSPIRACY
www.jerryesmith.com/books/research.php

SOME CITATIONS CONCERNING BARIUM AND ATMOSPHERIC ENGINEERING
stinet.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/fulcrum_main.pl

www.luxefaire.com/holeclouds/index.html

www.luxefaire.com/real/index.html

www.luxefaire.com/thosewhomoveclouds/index.html

www.chemtrailcentral.com

AEROSOL OPERATIONS CRIMES AND COVERUP
www.carnicom.com

www.bariumblues.com

THE PENTAGONS PEOPLE ZAPPER
www.sfbg.com/reality/22.html

CROWD CONTROL COOKERY: MICROWAVES AMONG THE NON-LETHAL WEAPONS
www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/27a/057.html

ATMOSPHERIC CHARGED-ION PLASMAS
www.luxefaire.com/chargedionplasmas/index.html

NON-LETHAL WEAPONS
www.au.af.mil/au/aul/bibs/soft/softkill.htm

MILITARY OPERATIONS OTHER THAN WAR
www.au.af.mil/au/aul/bibs/mootw/mootw3.htm

MORE NON LETHAL WEAPONS
www.au.af.mil/au/aul/bibs/soft/nonlethal.htm

home1.gte.net/quakker/Documents/Chemtrails_Over_America.htm

mindcontrolforums.com/mindattack-directedenergyweapons.htm

www.raven1.net/uncom.htm

www.webcom.com/~pinknoiz/coldwar/microwave.html

www.world-action.co.uk/gwen.html

www.gulfwarvets.com/nbc.htm

www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/bskies1.html

www.gulfwarillnesses.com/mycoplasma.htm

www.maebrussell.com/

www.datafilter.com/mc/humanExperimentation.html

RESOURCES ON HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION
www.dc.peachnet.edu/~shale/humanities/composition/assignments/experiment.html


----------------------------\
ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL I: BAN ON THE USE OF METHODS AND MEANS OF WARFARE
THAT DAMAGE THE ENVIRONMENT
Protocol I of 1977 additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 applies to international armed
conflict and contains two specific provisions for the protection of the environment. These provisions
are clearly complementary to the ENMOD Convention in the event of armed conflict: while the
Convention prohibits deliberate modification of the environment as a means of warfare, Additional
Protocol I prohibits attacks on the environment as such, regardless of the means used.
Article 35, para. 3 of Additional Protocol I prohibits the use of "methods or means of warfare which
are intended, or may be expected, to cause widespread, long-term and severe damage to the
natural environment".
Using the same language, Article 55 aims to protect the population, whose health and survival in the
event of armed conflict could be endangered by damage to the environment. The article also
prohibits attacks on the natural environment by way of reprisals.
The Rome Statute of 1998 incorporates some of the prohibitions contained in Additional Protocol I.
For instance, the future International Criminal Court will have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes
that consist in "intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause
incidental [...] widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be
clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated" (Article
8, para. 2 [b, iv]).
Source:
www.icrc.org/Web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/iwpList74/195998B28FD631C0C1256B66006021F5



COMPLETE FILE BELOW:

Annex 1 – reference material to accompany IUCN Statement
5
The definitions are as follows:
widespread: encompassing an area of several hundred square kilometres;
long-lasting: lasting for a period of months, or approximately a season;
severe: involving serious or significant disruption or harm to human life, natural and economic
resources or other assets.
As examples, the Understandings also include a non-exhaustive list of phenomena that could result
from the use of environmental modification techniques: earthquakes and tsunamis; an upset in the
ecological balance of a region; changes in weather patterns (clouds, precipitation, cyclones and
tornadic storms); changes in climate patterns; changes in ocean currents; changes in the state of
the ozone layer and changes in the state of the ionosphere.
ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL I: BAN ON THE USE OF METHODS AND MEANS OF WARFARE
THAT DAMAGE THE ENVIRONMENT
Protocol I of 1977 additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 applies to international armed
conflict and contains two specific provisions for the protection of the environment. These provisions
are clearly complementary to the ENMOD Convention in the event of armed conflict: while the
Convention prohibits deliberate modification of the environment as a means of warfare, Additional
Protocol I prohibits attacks on the environment as such, regardless of the means used.
Article 35, para. 3 of Additional Protocol I prohibits the use of "methods or means of warfare which
are intended, or may be expected, to cause widespread, long-term and severe damage to the
natural environment".
Using the same language, Article 55 aims to protect the population, whose health and survival in the
event of armed conflict could be endangered by damage to the environment. The article also
prohibits attacks on the natural environment by way of reprisals.
The Rome Statute of 1998 incorporates some of the prohibitions contained in Additional Protocol I.
For instance, the future International Criminal Court will have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes
that consist in "intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause
incidental [...] widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be
clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated" (Article
8, para. 2 [b, iv]).
Source:
www.icrc.org/Web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/iwpList74/195998B28FD631C0C1256B66006021F5
 

Account Login

Media Centers

Quote-of-the-Moment

An inglorious peace is better than a dishonorable war.
-- Mark Twain
Source: "Glances at History" (suppressed)
 

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software