Re: Anarchists blitzkrieg Nazi picnic in St. Louis

A hate group exposes itself as such

Current rating: 0
03 Oct 2006
Date Edited: 03 Oct 2006 04:54:33 PM

by john brown

Racism is racism, and the CCC is a well-known racist organization. So, it was a racist group having a picnic in a public park, where the very laws that permit the CCC to openly express its bigoted views also permit people to express their disagreement.

The fight, whoever started it, was indeed unfortunate, but that's frankly what happens when you confront hate groups like CCC. The CCC knows very well that it spreads racism and intolerance, just as it knows that it will encounter protests like this at its public events. The protestors who crashed the picnic brought hockey sticks for defense, since they were going to confront a group that has shown itself to be violent in the past.

Besides, both sides accuse the other starting the fight, just as posters on this page both for and against the CCC threaten further violence. Racists are hateful people, just as normal people hate racists. You can see that hate expressed clearly on this page, including in your own post.

Futhermore, I find it interesting that the nat'l CCC website only lists anonymous PO boxes as mailing address for each state's chapter, and just as the St. Louis CCC lists NO upcoming events on their website. What does the CCC have to hide? It is perhaps scared of attracting more protesters who disagree with its racist agenda?

Comments

Uncouth

Current rating: 0
03 Oct 2006

by Landers Hall

Reply to this comment

Counter-protesting street theater is one thing.

www.slacc.com/stlcofcc/20050505.html -- as an example. However, even at that, the histrionics about "bombs" could have been left at their respective homes.

But crashing a picnic crosses a line of decency and tact. If we learn that various far-left groups are going to have a picnic at a given place/time/day, we sure as Hades won't show up to the venue at all, much less crash it wearing face coverings, donning vinyl signs with curse words, overturning tables in the process.

There's free speech, but there's also a time and a place for everything. An analogue on the "far right," if you will, is the Fred Phelps milieu and his protests at military funerals. I agree with legislation to prohibit protests close to military funerals. Abusing free expression will lead to the end of free expression.

Re: Uncouth

Current rating: 0
03 Oct 2006

by anonyme

Reply to this comment

i find it entirely reasonable to believe that "Landers Hall" is in fact CCC headman, Gordon Lee Baum (attorney-at-law), and is 'innocently' posting his own website as a way to lure people into visiting it, only to track them through their IP address, hence the name. Please, don't disregard this post or delete it. I feel i'm not being paranoid but very close to correct in this situation. For those of you who are unaware, Gordon Lee (attorney-at-law) fancies himself a man of the law and may very well have a few tricks up his sleeve when "Landers Hall" posts things like "But I'm more interested that you expound on your consternation toward law enforcement."
This is an interesting thread, let's just not have it ruined by Gordon Lee . . . attorney-at-law.

Re: A hate group exposes itself as such

Current rating: 0
03 Oct 2006

by Earl

Reply to this comment

That's the biggest bunch of lies I've seen since Clinton last opened his mouth: "They brought their hockey sticks for self-defense"?

When we wrested those hockey sticks away from them, (after being first assaulted with them,) we didn't even attempt to retaliate in kind, although we'd have been more than justified in doing so.

Next time they will NOT be so fortunate...

Re: A hate group exposes itself as such

Current rating: 0
07 Oct 2006

by gee-bee

Reply to this comment

Let's see if we can figure this out...

A peaceful organization whose various protests and other events have *never* been marred by unprovoked violence is attacked by a bunch of hockey-stick weilding masked savages in a public park open to all and they don't want to publish thier home addresses and phone numbers on their website...

I suppose for a bunch of posers who claim they
love "diversity" (but not, of course, intellectual diversity-of-thought and especially not for those with unpopular minority viewpoints!) this would be difficult to understand.

And for someone who stupidly wants to try to "dare" those he wishes to attack while they sleep in their homes to publish him directions to the scene of his (next?) crime is possibly the most asinine thing I've ever seen published on the www to-date--and that's really saying something!