worcester
western mass
vermont
utah
urbana-champaign
tennessee
tampa bay
tallahassee-red hills
seattle
sarasota
santa cruz, ca
santa barbara
san francisco bay area
san francisco
san diego
saint louis
rogue valley
rochester
richmond
portland
pittsburgh
philadelphia
omaha
oklahoma
nyc
north texas
north carolina
new orleans
new mexico
new jersey
new hampshire
minneapolis/st. paul
milwaukee
michigan
miami
maine
madison
la
kansas city
ithaca
idaho
hudson mohawk
houston
hawaii
hampton roads, va
dc
columbus
colorado
cleveland
chicago
charlottesville
buffalo
boston
binghamton
big muddy
baltimore
austin
atlanta
asheville
arkansas
arizona
valencia
united kingdom
ukraine
toulouse
toscana
torun
thessaloniki
switzerland
sverige
scotland
saint-petersburg
russia
romania
roma
portugal
poland
piemonte
paris/Île-de-france
oost-vlaanderen
norway
nice
netherlands
napoli
nantes
marseille
malta
madrid
lombardia
lille
liege
la plana
italy
istanbul
ireland
imc patras
hungary
grenoble
germany
galiza
euskal herria
estrecho / madiaq
emilia-romagna
cyprus
croatia
calabria
bulgaria
bristol
belgrade
belgium
belarus
barcelona
austria
athens
armenia
antwerpen
andorra
alacantAn inglorious peace is better than a dishonorable war.
This site made manifest by dadaIMC software
And to those who cry "Censorship" and invoke the 1st Ammendment
22 Feb 2006
Date Edited: 22 Feb 2006 06:30:12 PM
In this country everyone (allegedly) has the right to say anything they want to. Period. This means that the government can't punish or persecute you for saying anything. History shows repeatedly that this isn't actually true, and there certainly are legal limits on free speech (the "clear and present danger" doctrine and obscenity being two examples). However, the point is that free speech rights have to do with what governments may not do to individuals or groups.
The 1st Amendment to the US Constitution does NOT mandate that STL IMC, or any other group or individual, publish what any given wingnut wants them to. Do you get the difference?
Try walking into the studios at your local NBC or Fox affiliate and demanding your "right to free speech" in the form of air time from 7-9pm, so that you can discuss how the world is being run by a secret cabal of alien lizard-men holed up inside our hollowed-out earth. My suspicion is that you won't get any air time and that your civil rights lawsuit against the station will go nowhere. Because NBC and Fox have the free speech right to control their own content. OF COURSE there are huge problems with consolidation of media, but the point is that free speech says people and groups can say what they want, AND refrain from saying things that they don't (like the pledge of allegiance or the lord's prayer).
This is because free speech doesn't give anyone the right to compel others to say anything, it just gives individuals control over their own mouths and their own pens and paper.
I hate to beat this dead horse so thoroughly, but there are always a few wingnuts who claim that IMC (or whomever) using its 1st amendment rights to decide what it does or doesn't say is actually an affront to the 1st amendment.
STL IMC adopting a moderation policy IS FREE SPEECH! IT IS THE ESSENCE OF FREE SPEECH! IMC has the right to decide what does or doesn't appear on its website. Want to say something that IMC won't publish? Get off your lazy ass and start your own site!! You have the right to say what you want. You don't have the right to hijack the audience that others have built through hard work.
So please, if you don't like the policy, fine, say so. But PUHLEEAZE quit pretending that IMC is like the Gestapo, repressing your free speech rights. IMC has free speech rights too. Don't like it? Go live somewhere without free speech rights.
Comments
Re: And to those who cry "Censorship" and invoke the 1st Ammendment
23 Feb 2006
Re: Re: And to those who cry "Censorship" and invoke the 1st Ammendment
23 Feb 2006
i wasn't directing my point at anyone in particular, i was directing it toward all those whom i predicted would respond to the policy in a certain way.
you are certainly entitled to your opinions, and to post them. and so am I. and we both have done so. so who has lost their freedom of speech? no one.
thanks for repeatedly calling me a jerk. that's helpful and useful on a board like this.
Re: And to those who cry "Censorship" and invoke the 1st Ammendment
26 Feb 2006
Seafoam Fan